[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130625184619.GA4003@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 20:46:19 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] epoll_[p]wait: fix spurious -EINTR on ptrace attach
On 06/25, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>
> Before this change, epoll_wait and epoll_pwait
> spuriously return with -EINTR on ptrace attach.
>
> By analogy with poll syscall family, epoll_[p]wait should be interruptible
> by signals regardless of SA_RESTART, therefore, this change
> makes them return -ERESTARTNOHAND if timeout has expired.
Denys, I am not even going to actuallu read this patch, but I think
you should redo it in any case... And you need to cc maintainers.
Because I believe we should cleanup fs/eventpoll.c first, I'll try
to send the patch(es) soon.
> In order to define a "sigset_t ksigmask" member,
You do not need it. But the reason is not clear until the cleanup.
> + if (sigmask) {
> + ksigmask = *sigmask;
> + sigdelsetmask(&ksigmask, sigmask(SIGKILL) | sigmask(SIGSTOP));
> + sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &ksigmask, &ksigsaved);
sigprocmask() should not be used. Again, we need cleanup.
> + }
> + else
> + /*
> + * If we changed the signal mask, we need to restore the original one.
> + */
> + if (sigmask) {
> + sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &ksigsaved, NULL);
> + }
cough.. in this case you should also update Documentation/CodingStyle ;)
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists