[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <477F20668A386D41ADCC57781B1F70430EA2BD5ECB@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:54:15 -0700
From: Bing Zhao <bzhao@...vell.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
CC: Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Will Newton <will.newton@...il.com>,
Ashok Nagarajan <asnagarajan@...omium.org>,
Paul Stewart <pstew@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] RFC: mmc: dw_mmc: Always go to STATE_DATA_BUSY from
STATE_DATA_ERROR
> I think the proposal on the table is to take Seungwon's patches
> instead of mine. Assuming they solve your problems, I'm OK with that.
> I think he was requesting testing the first of his two patches alone
> and then both of his two patches together.
Test #1: Swungwon's patch #1 alone [1]
Test #2: Swungwon's patch #2 alone [1]
Test #3: Swungwon's patch #1 and #2 [1]
Test #4: Doug's original patch [2]
Test #1 and #3: it doesn't work; system reboots due to kernel hung_task
Test #2 and #4: it works; instead of hung_task driver gets CRC error (which is expected)
Thanks,
Bing
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/8/316
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/15/583
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists