[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130625182157.377668058@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:32:20 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: [ 33/95] ACPI / resources: call acpi_get_override_irq() only for legacy IRQ resources
3.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
commit 204ebc0aa30a7115f300cac39fbb7eeb66524881 upstream.
acpi_get_override_irq() was added because there was a problem with
buggy BIOSes passing wrong IRQ() resource for the RTC IRQ. The
commit that added the workaround was 61fd47e0c8476 (ACPI: fix two
IRQ8 issues in IOAPIC mode).
With ACPI 5 enumerated devices there are typically one or more
extended IRQ resources per device (and these IRQs can be shared).
However, the acpi_get_override_irq() workaround forces all IRQs in
range 0 - 15 (the legacy ISA IRQs) to be edge triggered, active high
as can be seen from the dmesg below:
ACPI: IRQ 6 override to edge, high
ACPI: IRQ 7 override to edge, high
ACPI: IRQ 7 override to edge, high
ACPI: IRQ 13 override to edge, high
Also /proc/interrupts for the I2C controllers (INT33C2 and INT33C3) shows
the same thing:
7: 4 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge INT33C2:00, INT33C3:00
The _CSR method for INT33C2 (and INT33C3) device returns following
resource:
Interrupt (ResourceConsumer, Level, ActiveLow, Shared,,, )
{
0x00000007,
}
which states that this is supposed to be level triggered, active low,
shared IRQ instead.
Fix this by making sure that acpi_get_override_irq() gets only called
when we are dealing with legacy IRQ() or IRQNoFlags() descriptors.
While we are there, correct pr_warning() to print the right triggering
value.
This change turns out to be necessary to make DMA work correctly on
systems based on the Intel Lynxpoint PCH (Platform Controller Hub).
[rjw: Changelog]
Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/acpi/resource.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/acpi/resource.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/resource.c
@@ -304,7 +304,8 @@ static void acpi_dev_irqresource_disable
}
static void acpi_dev_get_irqresource(struct resource *res, u32 gsi,
- u8 triggering, u8 polarity, u8 shareable)
+ u8 triggering, u8 polarity, u8 shareable,
+ bool legacy)
{
int irq, p, t;
@@ -317,14 +318,19 @@ static void acpi_dev_get_irqresource(str
* In IO-APIC mode, use overrided attribute. Two reasons:
* 1. BIOS bug in DSDT
* 2. BIOS uses IO-APIC mode Interrupt Source Override
+ *
+ * We do this only if we are dealing with IRQ() or IRQNoFlags()
+ * resource (the legacy ISA resources). With modern ACPI 5 devices
+ * using extended IRQ descriptors we take the IRQ configuration
+ * from _CRS directly.
*/
- if (!acpi_get_override_irq(gsi, &t, &p)) {
+ if (legacy && !acpi_get_override_irq(gsi, &t, &p)) {
u8 trig = t ? ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE : ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE;
u8 pol = p ? ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW : ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH;
if (triggering != trig || polarity != pol) {
pr_warning("ACPI: IRQ %d override to %s, %s\n", gsi,
- t ? "edge" : "level", p ? "low" : "high");
+ t ? "level" : "edge", p ? "low" : "high");
triggering = trig;
polarity = pol;
}
@@ -373,7 +379,7 @@ bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct
}
acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, irq->interrupts[index],
irq->triggering, irq->polarity,
- irq->sharable);
+ irq->sharable, true);
break;
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ:
ext_irq = &ares->data.extended_irq;
@@ -383,7 +389,7 @@ bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct
}
acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, ext_irq->interrupts[index],
ext_irq->triggering, ext_irq->polarity,
- ext_irq->sharable);
+ ext_irq->sharable, false);
break;
default:
return false;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists