[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130625202343.GA4165@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:23:43 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] signals: eventpoll: set ->saved_sigmask at the start
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:57:59PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> + current->saved_sigmask = current->blocked;
> set_current_blocked(&ksigmask);
> }
>
> error = sys_epoll_wait(epfd, events, maxevents, timeout);
> -
> /*
> * If we changed the signal mask, we need to restore the original one.
> * In case we've got a signal while waiting, we do not restore the
> @@ -1988,12 +1988,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, struct epoll_event __user *, events,
> * the way back to userspace, before the signal mask is restored.
> */
> if (sigmask) {
> - if (error == -EINTR) {
> - memcpy(¤t->saved_sigmask, &sigsaved,
> - sizeof(sigsaved));
> + if (error == -EINTR)
> set_restore_sigmask();
> - } else
> - set_current_blocked(&sigsaved);
> + else
> + __set_current_blocked(¤t->saved_sigmask);
I don't like that. If anything, we have
static inline void restore_saved_sigmask(void)
{
if (test_and_clear_restore_sigmask())
__set_current_blocked(¤t->saved_sigmask);
}
which means that the last part can be turned into
set_restore_sigmask();
if (error != -EINTR)
restore_saved_sigmask();
and I'd pulled set_restore_sigmask() call next to setting the sucker.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists