[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130625202956.16593.29123.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 01:59:57 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
walken@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, sbw@....edu, fweisbec@...il.com,
zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Love <robert.w.love@...el.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
devel@...n-fcoe.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 24/45] [SCSI] fcoe: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to
prevent CPU offline
Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able
to depend on disabling preemption to prevent CPUs from going offline
from under us.
Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going
offline, while invoking from atomic context.
Cc: Robert Love <robert.w.love@...el.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>
Cc: devel@...n-fcoe.org
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
index 292b24f..a107d3c 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
@@ -1484,6 +1484,7 @@ static int fcoe_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev,
* was originated, otherwise select cpu using rx exchange id
* or fcoe_select_cpu().
*/
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
if (ntoh24(fh->fh_f_ctl) & FC_FC_EX_CTX)
cpu = ntohs(fh->fh_ox_id) & fc_cpu_mask;
else {
@@ -1493,8 +1494,10 @@ static int fcoe_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev,
cpu = ntohs(fh->fh_rx_id) & fc_cpu_mask;
}
- if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
+ if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
goto err;
+ }
fps = &per_cpu(fcoe_percpu, cpu);
spin_lock(&fps->fcoe_rx_list.lock);
@@ -1514,6 +1517,7 @@ static int fcoe_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev,
spin_lock(&fps->fcoe_rx_list.lock);
if (!fps->thread) {
spin_unlock(&fps->fcoe_rx_list.lock);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
goto err;
}
}
@@ -1535,6 +1539,7 @@ static int fcoe_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *netdev,
if (fps->thread->state == TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
wake_up_process(fps->thread);
spin_unlock(&fps->fcoe_rx_list.lock);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
return 0;
err:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists