linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] SG_IO filtering via sysfs and minimal whitelist

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51CA094C.1080400@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Jun 2013 23:19:08 +0200
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org, msnitzer@...hat.com,
	ksievers@...hat.com, jbottomley@...allels.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] SG_IO filtering via sysfs and minimal whitelist

Il 27/05/2013 15:50, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> 
> We've been running in circles for nine months now.  Let's restart from
> the maintainer's suggestion, which was probably dismissed too quickly.
> 
> This is still not a complete solution, because /dev/sgN does not have
> access to its queue object.  Still, it can be a base for discussion.
> 
> If accepted (in a complete form with access to the queue object for
> non-block devices), this series removes the need to fix the opcode
> conflicts as far as I'm concerned.  We could just consider that a
> feature of CONFIG_BLK_DEV_SG_FILTER_MMC.
> 
> Previously posted at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/25/397 (short thread).
> Rebased just fine, this one is compile-tested only.
> 
> Paolo

RFC didn't get many Cs.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/