[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130626075921.GD28748@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:59:21 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, anton@...msg.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmpressure: implement strict mode
On Wed 26-06-13 16:50:51, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:51:29PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > Currently, applications are notified for the level they registered for
> > _plus_ higher levels.
> >
> > This is a problem if the application wants to implement different
> > actions for different levels. For example, an application might want
> > to release 10% of its cache on level low, 50% on medium and 100% on
> > critical. To do this, the application has to register a different fd
> > for each event. However, fd low is always going to be notified and
> > and all fds are going to be notified on level critical.
> >
> > Strict mode solves this problem by strictly notifiying the event
> > an fd has registered for. It's optional. By default we still notify
> > on higher levels.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
>
> Shouldn't we make this default?
The interface is not there for long but still, changing it is always
quite tricky. And the users who care can be modified really easily so I
would stick with the original default.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists