[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130626122555.GE12640@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:25:55 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: George Cherian <george.cherian@...com>
CC: <balbi@...com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: host: xhci-plat: Enable XHCI_SPURIOUS_SUCCESS quirk
for xhci-plat
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:46:29PM +0530, George Cherian wrote:
> >>@@ -25,6 +25,16 @@ static void xhci_plat_quirks(struct device *dev, struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
> >> * dev struct in order to setup MSI
> >> */
> >> xhci->quirks |= XHCI_BROKEN_MSI;
> >>+
> >>+ /*
> >>+ * In some xhci controllers which follows xhci 1.0 spec gives a spurious
> >>+ * success event after a short transfer. This quirk will ignore such
> >>+ * spurious event. Hit this issue in synopsis xhci controllers with
> >>+ * hci_version > 0.96
> >>+ */
> >>+
> >>+ if (xhci->hci_version > 0x96)
> >>+ xhci->quirks |= XHCI_SPURIOUS_SUCCESS;
> >> }
> >doesn't look like the correct way to do this. What if enabling that
> >quirk on hosts which don't have the quirk cause problems ?
> For a controller which does not have this issue will never get a
> spurious success for short packet ( and that too for only ISOCH).
>
> per this commit ad808333d Intel xhci: Ignore spurious successful event.
>
> This spurious successful event behavior isn't technically disallowed by
> the xHCI specification, so make the xHCI driver just ignore the spurious
> completion event.
still we don't want to enable quirks for devices which aren't quirky :-)
Now how Sarah correctly enables the quirk flag only for the known "bad"
Panther Point device.
> >I would suggest adding a platform_data which (in our case) dwc3 will
> >pass to xhci-plat. Then you can do proper revision detection of the
> >synopsys controller and set the quirk only on the failing hosts.
> >
> >BTW, do you have the STARS number for this errata ?
> No STARS number yet.
once we have it, let's make sure to follow what we do on the dwc3 and
list it in a comment. You already that you found the bug with a Synopsys
controller anyway, might as well point to the fact that there is a
ticket with synopsys to track this issue.
cheers
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists