| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1372250364-20640-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:39:22 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Zlatko Calusic <zcalusic@...sync.net>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
dormando <dormando@...ia.net>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Kamezawa Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Linux-FSDevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd more followup
Further testing revealed that swapping was still higher than expected for
the parallel IO tests. There was also a performance regression reported
building kernels but there appears to be multiple sources of that problem.
This follow-up series primarily addresses the first swapping issue.
The tests were based on three kernels
vanilla: kernel 3.10-rc4 as that is what the current mmotm uses as a baseline
mmotm-20130606 is mmotm as of that date.
lessdisrupt-v1 is this follow-up series on top of the mmotm kernel
The first test used memcached+memcachetest while some background IO
was in progress as implemented by the parallel IO tests implement in
MM Tests. memcachetest benchmarks how many operations/second memcached
can service. It starts with no background IO on a freshly created ext4
filesystem and then re-runs the test with larger amounts of IO in the
background to roughly simulate a large copy in progress. The expectation
is that the IO should have little or no impact on memcachetest which is
running entirely in memory.
parallelio
3.10.0-rc4 3.10.0-rc4 3.10.0-rc4
vanilla mm1-mmotm-20130606 mm1-lessdisrupt-v1
Ops memcachetest-0M 23018.00 ( 0.00%) 22412.00 ( -2.63%) 22556.00 ( -2.01%)
Ops memcachetest-715M 23383.00 ( 0.00%) 22810.00 ( -2.45%) 22431.00 ( -4.07%)
Ops memcachetest-2385M 10989.00 ( 0.00%) 23564.00 (114.43%) 23054.00 (109.79%)
Ops memcachetest-4055M 3798.00 ( 0.00%) 24004.00 (532.02%) 24050.00 (533.23%)
Ops io-duration-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops io-duration-715M 12.00 ( 0.00%) 7.00 ( 41.67%) 7.00 ( 41.67%)
Ops io-duration-2385M 133.00 ( 0.00%) 21.00 ( 84.21%) 22.00 ( 83.46%)
Ops io-duration-4055M 159.00 ( 0.00%) 36.00 ( 77.36%) 36.00 ( 77.36%)
Ops swaptotal-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swaptotal-715M 139693.00 ( 0.00%) 19.00 ( 99.99%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swaptotal-2385M 268541.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 19.00 ( 99.99%)
Ops swaptotal-4055M 414269.00 ( 0.00%) 22059.00 ( 94.68%) 2.00 (100.00%)
Ops swapin-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-715M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-2385M 73189.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops swapin-4055M 126292.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%)
Ops minorfaults-0M 1536018.00 ( 0.00%) 1533536.00 ( 0.16%) 1607381.00 ( -4.65%)
Ops minorfaults-715M 1789978.00 ( 0.00%) 1616152.00 ( 9.71%) 1533462.00 ( 14.33%)
Ops minorfaults-2385M 1910448.00 ( 0.00%) 1614060.00 ( 15.51%) 1661727.00 ( 13.02%)
Ops minorfaults-4055M 1760518.00 ( 0.00%) 1613980.00 ( 8.32%) 1615116.00 ( 8.26%)
Ops majorfaults-0M 0.00 ( 0.00%) 0.00 ( 0.00%) 5.00 (-99.00%)
Ops majorfaults-715M 169.00 ( 0.00%) 234.00 (-38.46%) 48.00 ( 71.60%)
Ops majorfaults-2385M 14899.00 ( 0.00%) 100.00 ( 99.33%) 222.00 ( 98.51%)
Ops majorfaults-4055M 21853.00 ( 0.00%) 150.00 ( 99.31%) 128.00 ( 99.41%)
memcachetest is the transactions/second reported by memcachetest. In
the vanilla kernel note that performance drops from around
23K/sec to just over 4K/second when there is 2385M of IO going
on in the background. With current mmotm and the follow-on
series performance is good.
swaptotal is the total amount of swap traffic. With mmotm the total amount
of swapping is much reduced. Note that with 4G of background IO that
this follow-up series almost completely eliminated swap IO.
3.10.0-rc4 3.10.0-rc4 3.10.0-rc4
vanillamm1-mmotm-20130606mm1-lessdisrupt-v1
Minor Faults 11230171 10689656 10650607
Major Faults 37255 786 705
Swap Ins 199724 0 0
Swap Outs 623022 22078 21
Direct pages scanned 0 5378 51660
Kswapd pages scanned 15892718 1610408 1653629
Kswapd pages reclaimed 1097093 1083339 1107652
Direct pages reclaimed 0 5024 47241
Kswapd efficiency 6% 67% 66%
Kswapd velocity 13633.275 1385.369 1420.058
Direct efficiency 100% 93% 91%
Direct velocity 0.000 4.626 44.363
Percentage direct scans 0% 0% 3%
Zone normal velocity 13474.405 671.123 697.927
Zone dma32 velocity 158.870 718.872 766.494
Zone dma velocity 0.000 0.000 0.000
Page writes by reclaim 3065275.000 27259.000 6316.000
Page writes file 2442253 5181 6295
Page writes anon 623022 22078 21
Page reclaim immediate 8019 429 318
Sector Reads 963320 99096 151864
Sector Writes 13057396 10887480 10878500
Page rescued immediate 0 0 0
Slabs scanned 64896 23168 34176
Direct inode steals 0 0 0
Kswapd inode steals 8668 0 0
Kswapd skipped wait 0 0 0
Few observations
1. Swap outs were almost completely eliminated and there were no swap-ins.
2. Direct reclaim is active due to reduced activity from kswapd and the fact
that it is no longer reclaiming at priority 0
3. Zone scanning is still relatively balanced.
4. Page writes from reclaim context is still reasonable low.
3.10.0-rc4 3.10.0-rc4 3.10.0-rc4
vanillamm1-mmotm-20130606mm1-lessdisrupt-v1
Mean sda-avgqz 168.05 34.64 35.60
Mean sda-await 831.76 216.31 207.05
Mean sda-r_await 7.88 9.68 7.25
Mean sda-w_await 3088.32 223.90 218.28
Max sda-avgqz 1162.17 766.85 795.69
Max sda-await 6788.75 4130.01 3728.43
Max sda-r_await 106.93 242.00 65.97
Max sda-w_await 30565.93 4145.75 3959.87
Wait times are marginally reduced by the follow-up and still a massive
improve against the mainline kernel.
I tested parallel kernel builds when booted with 1G of RAM. 12 kernels
were built with 2 being compiled at any given time.
multibuild
3.10.0-rc4 3.10.0-rc4 3.10.0-rc4
vanilla mm1-mmotm-20130606 mm1-lessdisrupt-v1
User min 584.99 ( 0.00%) 553.31 ( 5.42%) 569.08 ( 2.72%)
User mean 598.35 ( 0.00%) 574.48 ( 3.99%) 581.65 ( 2.79%)
User stddev 10.01 ( 0.00%) 17.90 (-78.78%) 10.03 ( -0.14%)
User max 614.64 ( 0.00%) 598.94 ( 2.55%) 597.97 ( 2.71%)
User range 29.65 ( 0.00%) 45.63 (-53.90%) 28.89 ( 2.56%)
System min 35.78 ( 0.00%) 35.05 ( 2.04%) 35.54 ( 0.67%)
System mean 36.12 ( 0.00%) 35.69 ( 1.20%) 35.88 ( 0.69%)
System stddev 0.26 ( 0.00%) 0.55 (-113.69%) 0.21 ( 17.51%)
System max 36.53 ( 0.00%) 36.44 ( 0.25%) 36.13 ( 1.09%)
System range 0.75 ( 0.00%) 1.39 (-85.33%) 0.59 ( 21.33%)
Elapsed min 190.54 ( 0.00%) 190.56 ( -0.01%) 192.99 ( -1.29%)
Elapsed mean 197.58 ( 0.00%) 203.30 ( -2.89%) 200.53 ( -1.49%)
Elapsed stddev 4.65 ( 0.00%) 5.26 (-13.16%) 5.66 (-21.79%)
Elapsed max 203.72 ( 0.00%) 210.23 ( -3.20%) 210.46 ( -3.31%)
Elapsed range 13.18 ( 0.00%) 19.67 (-49.24%) 17.47 (-32.55%)
CPU min 308.00 ( 0.00%) 282.00 ( 8.44%) 294.00 ( 4.55%)
CPU mean 320.80 ( 0.00%) 299.78 ( 6.55%) 307.67 ( 4.09%)
CPU stddev 10.44 ( 0.00%) 13.83 (-32.50%) 9.71 ( 7.01%)
CPU max 340.00 ( 0.00%) 333.00 ( 2.06%) 328.00 ( 3.53%)
CPU range 32.00 ( 0.00%) 51.00 (-59.38%) 34.00 ( -6.25%)
Average kernel build times are still impacted but the follow-up series
helps marginally (it's too noisy to be sure). A preliminary bisection
indicated that there were multiple sources of the regression. The two
other points are the patches that cause mark_page_accessed to be obeyed
and the slab shrinker series. As there a number of patches in flight to
mmotm at the moment in different areas it would be best to confirm this
after this follow-up is merged.
mm/vmscan.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists