linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Added a check for NULL pointer in hid_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51CAF4C9.20407@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:03:53 +0200
From:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
To:	Michael Banken <michael.banken@...he.stud.uni-erlangen.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rydberg@...omail.se,
	srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com, erazor_de@...rs.sourceforge.net,
	jkosina@...e.cz, lorenz@...gers.com,
	linux-kernel@...informatik.uni-erlangen.de,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added a check for NULL pointer in hid_add_device

Hi Michael,

On 06/25/2013 07:51 PM, Michael Banken wrote:
> This check greatly simplifies creating a dummy hid device.

Could you elaborate a little here? If you want to create a hid device
from the user space, I encourage you to use uhid, which is available
since v3.6.

> With this check in place a hid dummy can be created simply by allocating and adding the device.
> This used to be possible in earlier Kernel versions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Banken <michael.banken@...he.stud.uni-erlangen.de>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenz Haspel <lorenz@...gers.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hid/hid-core.c |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> index 0951a9a..88c573e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> @@ -2289,24 +2289,27 @@ int hid_add_device(struct hid_device *hdev)
>  	if (hid_ignore(hdev))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Read the device report descriptor once and use as template
> -	 * for the driver-specific modifications.
> -	 */
> -	ret = hdev->ll_driver->parse(hdev);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -	if (!hdev->dev_rdesc)
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * Scan generic devices for group information
> -	 */
> -	if (hid_ignore_special_drivers ||
> -	    !hid_match_id(hdev, hid_have_special_driver)) {
> -		ret = hid_scan_report(hdev);
> +	if (hdev->ll_driver != NULL) {

I am concerned by the fact that *every* hid specific driver will have to
call hid_hw_start and hid_hw_stop at some point. These 2 functions  are
not protected against a null pointer in hdev->ll_driver, so allowing
here a null pointer will introduce a kernel oops later.

I think it would be safer to have:
if (!hdev->ll_driver)
	return -ENODEV;

But if I understood correctly, this is not your point.
So definitively, I need your usage scenarios of such hid "dummy" device.

Cheers,
Benjamin

> +		/*
> +		 * Read the device report descriptor once and use as template
> +			 * for the driver-specific modifications.
> +		 */
> +		ret = hdev->ll_driver->parse(hdev);
>  		if (ret)
> -			hid_warn(hdev, "bad device descriptor (%d)\n", ret);
> +			return ret;
> +		if (!hdev->dev_rdesc)
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Scan generic devices for group information
> +		 */
> +		if (hid_ignore_special_drivers ||
> +		    !hid_match_id(hdev, hid_have_special_driver)) {
> +			ret = hid_scan_report(hdev);
> +			if (ret)
> +				hid_warn(hdev,
> +					"bad device descriptor (%d)\n", ret);
> +		}
>  	}
>  
>  	/* XXX hack, any other cleaner solution after the driver core
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/