[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130626172122.GB14661@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:21:22 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Anders Hammarquist <iko@....pp.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ 17/17] USB: serial: ti_usb_3410_5052: new device id for Abbot
strip port cable
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:39:26PM +0200, Anders Hammarquist wrote:
> In a message of Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:39:32 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
> >3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> >From: Anders Hammarquist <iko@....pp.se>
> >
> >commit 35a2fbc941accd0e9f1bfadd669311786118d874 upstream.
> >
> >Add product id for Abbott strip port cable for Precision meter which
> >uses the TI 3410 chip.
>
> Given the statically sized arrays, I think this patch should not go in
> alone. It needs to go together with the later patches I sent you that
> fix the array sizing.
>
> (this applies to all trees)
Yes, but, thanks to the fact that you are only adding one more device
id, I don't think we are overflowing anything with this patch alone,
right? The only "bad" thing that could happen here is if a user
specifies a device/vendor id on the module command line, is it would
replace the device id you added, so all should be fine.
Or am I reading the code wrong?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists