[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51CB55DB.6040306@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:58:03 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
CC: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 3/6] drm: add SimpleDRM driver
On 06/24/2013 04:27 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> The SimpleDRM driver binds to simple-framebuffer devices and provides a
> DRM/KMS API. It provides only a single CRTC+encoder+connector combination
> plus one initial mode.
>
> Userspace can create one dumb-buffer and attach it to the CRTC. Only if
> the buffer is destroyed, a new buffer can be created. The buffer is
> directly mapped into user-space, so we have only resources for a single
> buffer. Otherwise, shadow buffers plus damage-request would be needed.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/simpledrm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/simpledrm/Kconfig
> +config DRM_SIMPLEDRM
> + tristate "Simple firmware framebuffer DRM driver"
> + depends on DRM && !FB_SIMPLE
> + help
> + SimpleDRM can run on all systems with pre-initialized graphics
> + hardware. It uses a framebuffer that was initialized during
> + firmware boot. No page-flipping, modesetting or other advanced
> + features are available. However, other DRM drivers can be loaded
> + later and take over from SimpleDRM if they provide real hardware
> + support.
> +
> + SimpleDRM supports: "simple-framebuffer" DeviceTree objects, x86 VESA
> + BIOS Extensions (VBE), EFI framebuffers
DT objects, yes. I'm not sure it's quite true to say it actually
directly supports VBE or EFI FBs; it's more the code in patch 2/6 that
supports those. I guess this is a bit nit-picky of a distinction though.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/simpledrm/simpledrm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/simpledrm/simpledrm_drv.c
> +static int parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct simplefb_platform_data *mode)
> + strlcpy(mode->format, format, sizeof(mode->format));
Even here, I believe the DT data sticks around so just copying the
pointer should be safe. It'd be worth validating that for sure though.
I didn't review the DRM stuff here since I'm not at all familiar with DRM.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists