[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51CB61DC.9030800@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 14:49:16 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
danders@...cuitco.com, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] pci: Add CircuitCo VENDOR ID and MinnowBoard DEVICE
ID
On 06/26/2013 02:46 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>> Microsoft has a "best practices" document, which may end up becoming
>> basis for a future PCI-SIG document clarifying the standard:
>>
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/gg463287.aspx
>
> Interesting, thanks for the link. If I read that correctly, the
> MinnowBoard is basically a motherboard, and any board layout change or
> component value change will require a new Subsystem ID, which will in
> turn require a pch_gbe update. That doesn't sound optimal, but maybe
> people don't actually interpret it that strictly.
>
It could be interpreted that literally, yes. This is part of why a
"subsystem" isn't necessarily forced to be a "board".
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists