[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130626234704.GG3344@jonmason-lab>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 16:47:04 -0700
From: Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com>
To: Dan Williams <djbw@...com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmadevices: dma_sync_wait undefined
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 02:20:30PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Jon Mason <jon.mason@...el.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 06:13:28PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> [..]
> > NTB is currently using it to flush any pending DMAs. This is needed
> > to allow the DMA engine and the CPU to perform operations on the same
> > "Memory Window". Without this, it is possible for the operations to
> > complete out of order, which is not a desired outcome for any network
> > traffic over NTB. CPU is preferred over DMA engine for small
> > transfers. Also, it provides an alternative for errors in the DMA
> > engine copy process (e.g., DMA mapping, device_prep_dma_memcpy, and
> > dmaengine_submit).
>
> Ok there really isn't a better alternative, is NTB always polling or
> does it also use completion callbacks?
It uses the callbacks. I've change the code to use dma_find_channel,
and will push it for review as a RFC shortly.
Thanks,
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists