[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8s88k6XyjAZhKNNH5bG7BODyZqw=mA+__BTku5gmF8HEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:43:40 +0530
From: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: DLOS <davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
LMML <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] media: davinci: vpif: capture: add V4L2-async support
Hi Hans,
Thanks for the review.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl> wrote:
> On Tue June 25 2013 17:17:34 Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>>
>> Add support for asynchronous subdevice probing, using the v4l2-async API.
>> The legacy synchronous mode is still supported too, which allows to
>> gradually update drivers and platforms.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
>> Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
>> Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
>> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
>> Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>
>> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++--------
>> drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.h | 2 +
>> include/media/davinci/vpif_types.h | 2 +
>> 3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
>> index 5514175..b11d7a7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/davinci/vpif_capture.c
>> @@ -1979,6 +1979,76 @@ vpif_init_free_channel_objects:
>> return err;
>> }
>>
>> +static int vpif_async_bound(struct v4l2_async_notifier *notifier,
>> + struct v4l2_subdev *subdev,
>> + struct v4l2_async_subdev *asd)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < vpif_obj.config->subdev_count; i++)
>> + if (!strcmp(vpif_obj.config->subdev_info[i].name,
>> + subdev->name)) {
>
> Since the subdev name is now prefixed with the i2c bus identifier instead of
> just the chip name, does this code still work? Shouldn't it be 'strstr' instead
> of strcmp? Ditto for vpif_display and possibly others where the same
> mechanism might be used.
>
This is because the DA850-EVM has two tvp514x devices and assigning
the tvp514x device to appropriate channel is important, In this case strstr()
wont work so I used strcmp instead to match it appropriately.
Yes the code still works tested on DA850-EVM, with this patch [1].
[1] http://git.linuxtv.org/mhadli/v4l-dvb-davinci_devices.git/commitdiff/c906a89762541361158cf73e9494fa2f1ff8ba02
Regards,
--Prabhakar Lad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists