[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <51CC724702000078000E149B@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:11:35 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Ben Guthro" <benjamin.guthro@...rix.com>
Cc: "Bob Moore" <robert.moore@...el.com>, <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"Rafaell J . Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] acpi: Adjust linux acpi OS functions to new
extended parameter
>>> On 27.06.13 at 17:02, Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@...rix.com> wrote:
> Change the function definitions of acpi_os_prepare_sleep() and
> acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep() to pass along the new extended sleep
> parameter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@...rix.com>
> Cc: Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>
> Cc: Rafaell J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/acpi/osl.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> include/linux/acpi.h | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> index e721863..0251c9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> @@ -77,8 +77,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_in_debugger);
> extern char line_buf[80];
> #endif /*ENABLE_DEBUGGER */
>
> -static int (*__acpi_os_prepare_sleep)(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_ctrl,
> - u32 pm1b_ctrl);
> +static int (*__acpi_os_prepare_sleep)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a, u32 val_b,
> + bool extended);
So from here till patch 5 the build will be half broken because of
the type mismatches? I think at least the types of the consumers
need to be changed in this patch; leaving the meat of the Xen
change to patch 4 is perhaps fine.
Jan
>
> static acpi_osd_handler acpi_irq_handler;
> static void *acpi_irq_context;
> @@ -1757,13 +1757,13 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_terminate(void)
> return AE_OK;
> }
>
> -acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_control,
> - u32 pm1b_control)
> +acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a, u32 val_b,
> + u8 extended)
> {
> int rc = 0;
> if (__acpi_os_prepare_sleep)
> - rc = __acpi_os_prepare_sleep(sleep_state,
> - pm1a_control, pm1b_control);
> + rc = __acpi_os_prepare_sleep(sleep_state, val_a, val_b,
> + extended);
> if (rc < 0)
> return AE_ERROR;
> else if (rc > 0)
> @@ -1772,8 +1772,8 @@ acpi_status acpi_os_prepare_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32
> pm1a_control,
> return AE_OK;
> }
>
> -void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state,
> - u32 pm1a_ctrl, u32 pm1b_ctrl))
> +void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a,
> + u32 val_b, bool extended))
> {
> __acpi_os_prepare_sleep = func;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 709a2f2..26f9996 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -477,8 +477,8 @@ static inline bool acpi_driver_match_device(struct device
> *dev,
> #endif /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> -void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state,
> - u32 pm1a_ctrl, u32 pm1b_ctrl));
> +void acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(int (*func)(u8 sleep_state, u32 val_a,
> + u32 val_b, bool extended));
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> void arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr, size_t size);
> #else
> @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static inline void
> arch_reserve_mem_area(acpi_physical_address addr,
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_X86 */
> #else
> -#define acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(func, pm1a_ctrl, pm1b_ctrl) do { } while
> (0)
> +#define acpi_os_set_prepare_sleep(func, val_a, val_b, ext) do { } while (0)
> #endif
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME)
> --
> 1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists