[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1372347413.2436.6.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:36:53 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
<linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next 4/5] sunrpc: use generic union inet_addr
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:43 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
[...]
> -/**
> - * rpc_cmp_addr - compare the address portion of two sockaddrs.
> - * @sap1: first sockaddr
> - * @sap2: second sockaddr
> - *
> - * Just compares the family and address portion. Ignores port, but
> - * compares the scope if it's a link-local address.
You're removing the scope comparison.
Ben.
> - * Returns true if the addrs are equal, false if they aren't.
> - */
> static inline bool rpc_cmp_addr(const struct sockaddr *sap1,
> const struct sockaddr *sap2)
> {
> - if (sap1->sa_family == sap2->sa_family) {
> - switch (sap1->sa_family) {
> - case AF_INET:
> - return __rpc_cmp_addr4(sap1, sap2);
> - case AF_INET6:
> - return __rpc_cmp_addr6(sap1, sap2);
> - }
> - }
> - return false;
> + return inet_addr_equal((const union inet_addr *)sap1,
> + (const union inet_addr *)sap2);
> }
[...]
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists