[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130627162720.GA18961@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:27:20 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: "zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] tracing/uprobes: Support ftrace_event_file base
multibuffer
On 06/27, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> * zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com> [2013-06-25 11:30:20]:
> > + if (!enabled) {
> > + tu->consumer.filter = filter;
> > + ret = uprobe_register(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer);
> > + if (ret)
> > + tu->flags &= file ? ~TP_FLAG_TRACE : ~TP_FLAG_PROFILE;
>
> Dont we need to free link here? or where does the link that got
> allocated freed?
Agreed...
Masami, it seems that (just in case, with or without "Turn trace_probe->files
into list_head" I sent) trace_kpobes needs the similar fix too? Plus it should
clear TP_FLAG_* if enable_k.*probe() fails.
Or enable_trace_probe() assumes that enable_kprobe() must succeed? In this
case probably WARN_ON(ret) makes sense.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists