[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo41WuYStPAo19k7qF5GRH+tBbS-iSR_xQtjk+egrq_vSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:50:08 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"Penner, Miles J" <miles.j.penner@...el.com>,
Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] PCI: acpiphp: enable_device(): rescan even if no new
devices on slot
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Mika Westerberg
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 04:02:29PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:37:58PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> > > @@ -707,8 +702,11 @@ static int __ref enable_device(struct acpiphp_slot *slot)
>> > > dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_CARDBUS) {
>> > > max = pci_scan_bridge(bus, dev, max, pass);
>> > > if (pass && dev->subordinate) {
>> > > - check_hotplug_bridge(slot, dev);
>> > > - pcibios_resource_survey_bus(dev->subordinate);
>> > > + if (!dev->subordinate->is_added) {
>> > > + check_hotplug_bridge(slot, dev);
>> > > + pcibios_resource_survey_bus(
>> > > + dev->subordinate);
>> >
>> > It's a shame that pcibios_resource_survey_bus() can't be called twice.
>> > It would be nice if it were smart enough to notice on the second call
>> > that "oh, resources have already been assigned, so there's nothing
>> > more to be done." Did you look to see whether that's feasible?
>>
>> I didn't but now that you mentioned I went and checked. I'm pretty sure we
>> can handle it there in the next revision and drop this change.
>
> With following patch that fixes pcibios_resource_survey_bus() Thunderbolt
> seems to be working just fine (and the quirk is gone).
>
> If it looks okay, I'll include it into the next iteration of the patches.
That looks great, thanks a lot for exploring this!
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> index 94919e3..db6b1ab 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/i386.c
> @@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ static void pcibios_allocate_bridge_resources(struct pci_dev *dev)
> r = &dev->resource[idx];
> if (!r->flags)
> continue;
> + if (r->parent) /* Already allocated */
> + continue;
> if (!r->start || pci_claim_resource(dev, idx) < 0) {
> /*
> * Something is wrong with the region.
> @@ -318,6 +320,8 @@ static void pcibios_allocate_dev_rom_resource(struct pci_dev *dev)
> r = &dev->resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE];
> if (!r->flags || !r->start)
> return;
> + if (r->parent) /* Already allocated */
> + return;
>
> if (pci_claim_resource(dev, PCI_ROM_RESOURCE) < 0) {
> r->end -= r->start;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists