[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130627195439.29830.96122.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:24:39 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
walken@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, David.Laight@...lab.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, sbw@....edu, fweisbec@...il.com,
zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 13/45] sched/fair: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to
prevent CPU offline
Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able
to depend on disabling preemption to prevent CPUs from going offline
from under us.
Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going
offline, while invoking from atomic context.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index f77f9c5..62d98dd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3369,7 +3369,8 @@ done:
*
* Returns the target CPU number, or the same CPU if no balancing is needed.
*
- * preempt must be disabled.
+ * Must be called within get/put_online_cpus_atomic(), to prevent CPUs
+ * from going offline from under us.
*/
static int
select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
@@ -5289,6 +5290,8 @@ void idle_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
raw_spin_unlock(&this_rq->lock);
update_blocked_averages(this_cpu);
+
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_domain(this_cpu, sd) {
unsigned long interval;
@@ -5312,6 +5315,7 @@ void idle_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq)
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
raw_spin_lock(&this_rq->lock);
@@ -5338,6 +5342,7 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data)
struct rq *target_rq = cpu_rq(target_cpu);
struct sched_domain *sd;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
raw_spin_lock_irq(&busiest_rq->lock);
/* make sure the requested cpu hasn't gone down in the meantime */
@@ -5389,6 +5394,7 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data)
out_unlock:
busiest_rq->active_balance = 0;
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&busiest_rq->lock);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
return 0;
}
@@ -5549,6 +5555,7 @@ static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum cpu_idle_type idle)
update_blocked_averages(cpu);
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
rcu_read_lock();
for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
if (!(sd->flags & SD_LOAD_BALANCE))
@@ -5597,6 +5604,7 @@ out:
break;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
/*
* next_balance will be updated only when there is a need.
@@ -5728,6 +5736,7 @@ static void run_rebalance_domains(struct softirq_action *h)
enum cpu_idle_type idle = this_rq->idle_balance ?
CPU_IDLE : CPU_NOT_IDLE;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
rebalance_domains(this_cpu, idle);
/*
@@ -5736,6 +5745,7 @@ static void run_rebalance_domains(struct softirq_action *h)
* stopped.
*/
nohz_idle_balance(this_cpu, idle);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
}
static inline int on_null_domain(int cpu)
@@ -5753,8 +5763,10 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq, int cpu)
likely(!on_null_domain(cpu)))
raise_softirq(SCHED_SOFTIRQ);
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
if (nohz_kick_needed(rq, cpu) && likely(!on_null_domain(cpu)))
nohz_balancer_kick(cpu);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
#endif
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists