[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51CC98E6.1020104@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:56:22 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
CC: <grant.likely@...aro.org>, <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dt: bindings: TI WiLink modules
On 06/27/2013 02:46 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:12 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
[...]
>> Indexes to another entity is always a maintenance burden in the longer
>> run and needs judicious control. If it is possible to avoid it by
>> selecting the right parameters, I am a hard advocate for the same.
>
> I tend to agree. But you need a balance. In theory you're right. But
> I think if you take the real world example, it is over-engineering.
>
> Anyway, if you *really* think this needs to be changed, I think we're in
> a deadlock here and I'd like to hear other people's opinions. I don't
> mind making the change, but I'm still not convinced it is worth it,
> since it just adds complexity.
>
> And hey, this is too much bikeshedding for such a small detail.
Lol :)
Alrite, if no one else is complaining, I am not going to block it either.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists