linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] of: Specify initrd location using 64-bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51CCA67C.2010803@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:54:20 -0500
From:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
To:	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
CC:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@...com>,
	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	arm@...nel.org, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
	Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Specify initrd location using 64-bit

On 06/21/2013 12:20 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Friday 21 June 2013 05:04 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>> On 06/21/2013 02:52 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c b/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c
>>> index 0a2c68f..62e2e8f 100644
>>> --- a/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c
>>> +++ b/arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c
>>> @@ -136,8 +136,7 @@ void __init early_init_devtree(void *params)
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD
>>> -void __init early_init_dt_setup_initrd_arch(unsigned long start,
>>> -		unsigned long end)
>>> +void __init early_init_dt_setup_initrd_arch(u64 start, u64 end)
>>>  {
>>>  	initrd_start = (unsigned long)__va(start);
>>>  	initrd_end = (unsigned long)__va(end);
>>
>> I think it would better to go here for phys_addr_t instead of u64. This
>> would force you in of_flat_dt_match() to check if the value passed from
>> DT specifies a memory address outside of 32bit address space and the
>> kernel can't deal with this because its phys_addr_t is 32bit only due
>> to a Kconfig switch.
>>
>> For x86, the initrd has to remain in the 32bit address space so passing
>> the initrd in the upper range would violate the ABI. Not sure if this
>> is true for other archs as well (ARM obviously not).
>>
> That pretty much means phys_addr_t. It will work for me as well but
> in last thread from consistency with memory and reserved node, Rob
> insisted to keep it as u64. So before I re-spin another version,
> would like to here what Rob has to say considering the x86 requirement.
> 
> Rob,
> Are you ok with phys_addr_t since your concern was about rest
> of the memory specific bits of the device-tree code use u64 ?

No. I still think it should be u64 for same reasons I said originally.

Rob

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/