[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130627150231.2bc00e3efcd426c4beef894c@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:02:31 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhocko@...e.cz,
minchan@...nel.org, anton@...msg.org, kmpark@...radead.org,
hyunhee.kim@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vmpressure: implement strict mode
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 23:17:12 -0400 Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com> wrote:
> Currently, an eventfd is notified for the level it's registered for
> _plus_ higher levels.
>
> This is a problem if an application wants to implement different
> actions for different levels. For example, an application might want
> to release 10% of its cache on level low, 50% on medium and 100% on
> critical. To do this, an application has to register a different
> eventfd for each pressure level. However, fd low is always going to
> be notified and and all fds are going to be notified on level critical.
>
> Strict mode solves this problem by strictly notifiying an eventfd
> for the pressure level it registered for. This new mode is optional,
> by default we still notify eventfds on higher levels too.
>
It didn't take long for this simple interface to start getting ugly :(
And having the fd operate in different modes is ugly.
Can we instead pass the level in the event payload?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists