[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAECXXi4DpXx2A_5pHXi5aM8avRM8EScCXjB1sdrXu6nizyAzaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:25:44 -0400
From: Paul Clements <paul.clements@...sios.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nbd-general@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<nbd-general@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nbd: correct disconnect behavior
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:20:37 -0400 Paul Clements <paul.clements@...sios.com> wrote:
> OK, but. "Would it be safer to clear ->disconnect in NBD_DO_IT?"
About the same in terms of safety. Both ioctls have to be called to
set up the device and neither can be called again, until the device is
reset.
> If not safer, would it be cleaner?
I don't know, seems like a toss up. NBD_SET_SOCK is the earliest place
that the socket might conceivably be usable, so I wanted to clear
disconnect there (e.g., in case an alternate/new version of NBD_DO_IT,
as has been discussed, is ever implemented).
>> > The cool kids are using bool lately ;)
>> >
>>
>> Hey, maybe I want to be able to compile with gcc 2.7.2 ? :)
>
> Sob, I miss 2.7.2. It was a good 50% faster than the new improved
> models. But I don't think this yearning makes us cool.
No, I think it just makes us old :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists