[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomKfHrzHpquN6adfb9r37Lf+FvDKnWBg_ebmuDcC-41Tw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:21:21 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocky" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>,
Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core
On 28 June 2013 12:19, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com> wrote:
> No, I will use:
>
> if (boost_enabled != state) {
> write_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
> boost_enabled = state;
>
> ret = cpufreq_driver->enable_boost(state);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ only one callback call
> if (ret)
> boost_enabled = 0;
>
> write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
>
> if (ret)
> pr_err("%s: BOOST cannot enable (%d)\n",
> __func__, ret);
> }
>
> and @ cpufreq_register_driver() I will add following line:
>
> if (!cpufreq_driver->enable_boost)
> cpufreq_driver->enable_boost = &cpufreq_boost_enable_sw;
>
> When cpufreq driver doesn't define callback for enable_boost it will be
> filled with default SW cpufreq_boost_enable_sw callback.
That's some smart code. Good. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists