[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130628005642.GA2232@udknight>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:56:42 +0800
From: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
x86@...nel.org, bp@...e.de, fenghua.yu@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix override new_cpu_data.x86 with 486
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:54:35PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 12:26:40AM +0800, Wang YanQing wrote:
> >
> > We should set X86 to 486 before use cpuid
> > to detect the cpu type, if we set X86 to 486
> > after cpuid, then we will get 486 for ever.
>
> So not "for ever" but until cpu_detect runs.
>
> >
> > Yes, we will correct this in early_cpu_init,
> > but it is still a wrong behavior, right? So
> > just fix it.
>
> Right, so this patch is correct and it fixes the small window where we
> run with family == 4 before cpu_detect but the commit message needs a
> bit massaging before it gets applied.
I think it fixes the window where we run with family > 4 before cpu_detect :)
>
> >
> > I also find maybe we can delete the new_cpu_data,
> > because we will over write all the information
> > in early_cpu_init, and before early_cpu_init,
> > there is no user of new_cpu_data, but this is
> > another patch in the future.
>
> You can drop that part.
I can't catch the exactly meaning:
We can drop the new_cpu_data or
I need to drop this part commit
message.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists