[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130628085627.GA28407@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:56:27 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] sched: Track NUMA hinting faults on per-node basis
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 11:38:29AM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> [2013-06-26 15:38:01]:
> > @@ -826,6 +833,9 @@ void task_numa_fault(int node, int pages, bool migrated)
> > p->numa_scan_period + jiffies_to_msecs(10));
> >
> > task_numa_placement(p);
> > +
> > + /* Record the fault, double the weight if pages were migrated */
> > + p->numa_faults[node] += pages << migrated;
>
>
> Why are we doing this after the placement.
> I mean we should probably be doing this in the task_numa_placement,
The placement only does something when we've completed a full scan; this
would then be the first fault of the next scan. Hence we do placement
first so as not to add this first fault of the next scan to
->numa_faults[].
This all gets changed later on when ->numa_faults_curr[] gets
introduced.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists