lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANq1E4TScD2EvGS-nah=QACV+JmxYhYQRNVdRe8TSZzJD6UJ7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:03:11 +0200
From:	David Herrmann <dh.herrmann@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc:	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/6] fbdev: simplefb: add init through platform_data

Hi

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org> wrote:
> On 06/24/2013 04:27 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
>> If we create proper platform-devices in x86 boot-code, we can use simplefb
>> for VBE or EFI framebuffers, too. However, there is normally no OF support
>> so we introduce a platform_data object so x86 boot-code can pass the
>> paramaters via plain old platform-data.
>>
>> This also removes the OF dependency as it is not needed. The headers
>> provide proper dummies for the case OF is disabled.
>>
>> Furthermore, we move the FORMAT-definitions to the common platform header
>> so initialization code can use it to transform "struct screen_info" to
>> the right format-name.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/simplefb.h b/include/linux/platform_data/simplefb.h
>
>> +/* the framebuffer size and location is available as IORESOURCE_MEM */
>> +struct simplefb_platform_data {
>> +     u32 width;
>> +     u32 height;
>> +     u32 stride;
>> +     char format[64];
>> +};
>
> Any reason not to make format:
>
> const char *format;
>
> You should be able to initialize that just as easily in platform code,
> either as static data or at runtime, I think.

That makes sense. I fixed it up.

Thanks
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ