linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] imx-drm: ipu-dp: Adjust the maximum number of flows

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:25:56 -0300
From:	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, shawn.guo@...aro.org,
	kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] imx-drm: ipu-dp: Adjust the maximum number of flows

Hi Uwe,

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:32:05AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
>>
>> Later in ipu_dp_get() the index of the flow array is calculated by:
>> flow >> 1
>>
>> So adjust its maximum to IPUV3_NUM_FLOWS << 1.
> Maybe squash this into patch 4?

Patch 4 is just cosmetic, but in this one I am changing the comparison from:
'if (flow > 5)' to 'if (flow > 6)'

,so that's why I splitted them.

I am OK with squashing the two patches together though.

Sascha,

Do you agree with the 'if (flow > 6)' change?

Thanks,

Fabio Estevam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/