[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1372426454.28529.3.camel@phoenix>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:34:14 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Yi Zhang <yizhang@...vell.com>, Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: 88pm800: Remove NULL test for
regulator_unregister()
It's safe to call regulator_unregister with NULL.
In additional, having NULL check in the for loop is wrong because
the for loop exits if pm800_data->regulators[i] is NULL.
So we have have some regulators remains registered.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
---
drivers/regulator/88pm800.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c b/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c
index afa3762..1fc1899 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/88pm800.c
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static int pm800_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register %s\n",
info->desc.name);
- while (--i >= 0 && pm800_data->regulators[i])
+ while (--i >= 0)
regulator_unregister(pm800_data->regulators[i]);
return ret;
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ static int pm800_regulator_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct pm800_regulators *pm800_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
int i;
- for (i = 0; pm800_data->regulators[i] && i < PM800_ID_RG_MAX; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < PM800_ID_RG_MAX; i++)
regulator_unregister(pm800_data->regulators[i]);
return 0;
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists