[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51CD9AE4.6060307@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:17:08 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fixup for removing -f option in perf record
On 6/28/13 3:47 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> I thought -f was the implied default for ages?
>>
>> OK.. I've been dutifully typing it all this while :-)
>
> The '-f' option in record command had no affect.. myabe it got
> depreceated when we started to backup perf.data to perf.data.old..?
Way back in 2010, 2.6.34 kernel - 7865e817 commit. I've been typing the
-f for while too. Now about the need for the pesky -f on the analysis
side....
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists