| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1372436683-31711-9-git-send-email-liuj97@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2013 00:24:41 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: liuj97@...il.com, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 08/10] ACPI: change acpi_[bay|dock]_match() in scan.c as global functions
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
Function acpi_[bay|dock]_match() in scan.c could be shared with dock.c
to reduce duplicated code, so refine and change them as global functions.
Also add a new function acpi_ata_match() to check whether an ACPI object
device is an ATA device.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 3 ++
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 101a267..e7fd101 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1481,43 +1481,45 @@ static void acpi_device_get_busid(struct acpi_device *device)
}
/*
+ * acpi_ata_match - see if an acpi object is an ATA device
+ *
+ * If an acpi object has one of the ACPI ATA methods defined,
+ * then we can safely call it an ATA device.
+ */
+bool acpi_ata_match(acpi_handle handle)
+{
+ return acpi_has_method(handle, "_GTF") ||
+ acpi_has_method(handle, "_GTM") ||
+ acpi_has_method(handle, "_STM") ||
+ acpi_has_method(handle, "_SDD");
+}
+
+/*
* acpi_bay_match - see if an acpi object is an ejectable driver bay
*
* If an acpi object is ejectable and has one of the ACPI ATA methods defined,
* then we can safely call it an ejectable drive bay
*/
-static int acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle)
+bool acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle)
{
acpi_handle phandle;
if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_EJ0"))
- return -ENODEV;
+ return false;
+ if (acpi_ata_match(handle))
+ return true;
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_parent(handle, &phandle)))
+ return false;
- if (acpi_has_method(handle, "_GTF") ||
- acpi_has_method(handle, "_GTM") ||
- acpi_has_method(handle, "_STM") ||
- acpi_has_method(handle, "_SDD"))
- return 0;
-
- if (acpi_get_parent(handle, &phandle))
- return -ENODEV;
-
- if (acpi_has_method(phandle, "_GTF") ||
- acpi_has_method(phandle, "_GTM") ||
- acpi_has_method(phandle, "_STM") ||
- acpi_has_method(phandle, "_SDD"))
- return 0;
-
- return -ENODEV;
+ return acpi_ata_match(phandle);
}
/*
* acpi_dock_match - see if an acpi object has a _DCK method
*/
-static int acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle)
+bool acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle)
{
- acpi_handle tmp;
- return acpi_get_handle(handle, "_DCK", &tmp);
+ return acpi_has_method(handle, "_DCK");
}
const char *acpi_device_hid(struct acpi_device *device)
@@ -1555,33 +1557,26 @@ static void acpi_add_id(struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp, const char *dev_id)
* lacks the SMBUS01 HID and the methods do not have the necessary "_"
* prefix. Work around this.
*/
-static int acpi_ibm_smbus_match(acpi_handle handle)
+static bool acpi_ibm_smbus_match(acpi_handle handle)
{
- struct acpi_buffer path = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
- int result;
+ char node_name[ACPI_PATH_SEGMENT_LENGTH];
+ struct acpi_buffer path = { sizeof(node_name), node_name };
if (!dmi_name_in_vendors("IBM"))
- return -ENODEV;
+ return false;
/* Look for SMBS object */
- result = acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_SINGLE_NAME, &path);
- if (result)
- return result;
-
- if (strcmp("SMBS", path.pointer)) {
- result = -ENODEV;
- goto out;
- }
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_SINGLE_NAME, &path)) ||
+ strcmp("SMBS", path.pointer))
+ return false;
/* Does it have the necessary (but misnamed) methods? */
- result = -ENODEV;
if (acpi_has_method(handle, "SBI") &&
acpi_has_method(handle, "SBR") &&
acpi_has_method(handle, "SBW"))
- result = 0;
-out:
- kfree(path.pointer);
- return result;
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
}
static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp,
@@ -1629,11 +1624,11 @@ static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp,
*/
if (acpi_is_video_device(handle))
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_VIDEO_HID);
- else if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bay_match(handle)))
+ else if (acpi_bay_match(handle))
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_BAY_HID);
- else if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_dock_match(handle)))
+ else if (acpi_dock_match(handle))
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_DOCK_HID);
- else if (!acpi_ibm_smbus_match(handle))
+ else if (acpi_ibm_smbus_match(handle))
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_SMBUS_IBM_HID);
else if (list_empty(&pnp->ids) && handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT) {
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_BUS_HID); /* \_SB, LNXSYBUS */
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index 6c378d9..60fff75 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ acpi_status acpi_execute_simple_method(acpi_handle handle, char *method,
u64 arg);
acpi_status acpi_evaluate_ej0(acpi_handle handle);
acpi_status acpi_evaluate_lck(acpi_handle handle, int lock);
+bool acpi_ata_match(acpi_handle handle);
+bool acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle);
+bool acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle);
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists