linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] hwmon: Add a simple driver to read the MXS SoC temperature

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130628163540.GA26547@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:35:40 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Cc:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>, jimwall@...om,
	brian@...stalfontz.com, Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lm-sensors@...sensors.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] hwmon: Add a simple driver to read the MXS SoC
 temperature

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:24:43PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 06/28/2013 04:50 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 28/06/2013 16:18, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> >> On 06/27/2013 09:26 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >>>
> >>> They are already registered as IIO_TEMP but only implement read_raw. Also,
> >>>
> >>> iio_hwmon_read_val() is using iio_read_channel_processed() and that will
> >>> basically only read one of the 2 channels. As I documented, you actually
> >>> need to read both channel 8 and channel 9 and then compute the value in
> >>> Kelvins. I'm not sure how you want me to do that in the current framework.
> >> What are these two channels actually measuring? Is the value of a single
> >> channel meaningful on it's own? If not it might make sense to update the IIO
> >> driver to just have one temperature channel.
> > 
> > It's not actually meaningful on its own. So, what you would do is expose
> > one iio channel for two ADC channels and do the computation in read_raw
> > ? or read_processed ? Then using iio-hwon to export it. ?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> 
> Yes, return channel9 - channel8 as the raw value for the temperature channel
> and provide proper scale and offset values, so that
> iio_read_channel_processed() will return the correct value.
> 
Agreed.

Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/