[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130628044305.GQ6123@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 06:43:05 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@...il.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@...or.com>,
Eilon Greenstien <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@...il.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@...lanox.com>,
Alex Rosenbaum <alexr@...lanox.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@...ir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] net: poll/select low latency socket support
> @@ -400,6 +402,8 @@ int do_select(int n, fd_set_bits *fds, struct timespec *end_time)
> poll_table *wait;
> int retval, i, timed_out = 0;
> unsigned long slack = 0;
> + unsigned int ll_flag = POLL_LL;
> + u64 ll_time = ll_end_time();
So you're adding a sched_clock to every select call, even if it has
nothing to do with ll?
That seems rather drastic. select can be performance critical.
-andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists