[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130628204631.GB15288@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 22:46:31 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Reserve only one queue tag for sync IO if only 3
tags are available
On Fri 28-06-13 21:31:52, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28 2013, Jan Kara wrote:
> > In case a device has three tags available we still reserve two of them
> > for sync IO. That leaves only a single tag for async IO such as
> > writeback from flusher thread which results in poor performance.
> >
> > Allow async IO to consume two tags in case queue has three tag availabe
> > to get a decent async write performance.
> >
> > This patch improves streaming write performance on a machine with such disk
> > from ~21 MB/s to ~52 MB/s. Also postmark throughput in presence of
> > streaming writer improves from 8 to 12 transactions per second so sync
> > IO doesn't seem to be harmed in presence of heavy async writer.
>
> That's pretty crazy! Never seen a device like that. But yes, it
> obviously exists, and the 2 reserved tags doesn't work well for that. So
> it's an improvement.
Yeah, I agree it's a weird hardware. It's a ppc64 machine where storage
identifies as:
scsi2 : IBM 573E Storage Adapter
scsi 2:0:4:0: Direct-Access IBM ST373453LC C51C PQ: 0 ANSI: 3
scsi 2:0:5:0: Direct-Access IBM H0 ST373207LC C70D PQ: 0 ANSI: 4
scsi 2:0:8:0: Direct-Access IBM H0 ST373207LC C70D PQ: 0 ANSI: 4
It took me a while to figure out why this machine observes performance
characteristics noone else sees.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists