[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51D13EF0.6030702@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 11:33:52 +0300
From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: <balbi@...com>, <tony@...mide.com>, <ruslan.bilovol@...com>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] USB: ehci-omap: Suspend the controller during
bus suspend
On 06/28/2013 10:18 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2013, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
>> Just found the problem. It seems that enabling the ehci_irq _after_ the root hub is resumed
>> is the root cause of the problem. Doing so will miss events from the root hub.
>
> This sounds like a bug in the IRQ setup. It's the sort of thing you
> see when a level-triggered IRQ is treated as though it were
> edge-triggered.
>
> In any case, the wakeup should have worked whether the IRQ was issued
> or not.
>
OK.
>
> I appreciate the symmetry of putting the enable_irq call in ehci-hcd,
> seeing as how the disable_irq is there too. On the other hand, every
> HCD using this mechanism is going to have to do the same thing, which
> argues for putting the enable call in the core. Perhaps at the start
OK.
> of hcd_resume_work() instead of the end.
>
We can't enable_irq at the start as the controller will only be resumed
after usb_remote_wakeup().
cheers,
-roger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists