linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+icZUXyizuCR3YDfFXD5hCkgycFYGzMHaJxg=m9UackT7uzGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Jul 2013 10:49:59 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jul 1 [ drm-intel-next: Several call-traces ]

On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130628:
>
> The regulator tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> next-20130628.
>
> The trivial tree gained a conflict against the fbdev tree.
>
> The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the net-next tree.
>
> The akpm tree lost a few patches that turned up elsewhere and I removed 2
> that were causing run time problems.
>

[ CC drm and drm-intel folks ]

[ Did not check any relevant MLs ]

Please, see attached dmesg output.

- Sedat -

View attachment "dmesg_3.10.0-next20130701-1-iniza-small.txt" of type "text/plain" (91391 bytes)

Download attachment "config-3.10.0-next20130701-1-iniza-small" of type "application/octet-stream" (114284 bytes)