linux-kernel - Re: sched: context tracking demolishes pipe-test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1372670432.7678.114.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date:	Mon, 01 Jul 2013 11:20:32 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: sched: context tracking demolishes pipe-test

On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 11:12 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: 
> On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 10:06 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> > So aside from the context tracking stuff, there's still a regression
> > we might want to look at. That's still a ~10% drop against 2.6.32 for
> > TCP_RR and few percents for tbench.
> 
> Yeah, known, and some of it's ours.

(btw tbench has a ~5% phase-of-moon jitter, you can pretty much
disregard that one)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/