linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] regulator: palmas: model SMPS10 as two regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51D1548E.4080008@ti.com>
Date:	Mon, 1 Jul 2013 15:36:06 +0530
From:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:	<lgirdwood@...il.com>, <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	<gg@...mlogic.co.uk>, <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, <j-keerthy@...com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] regulator: palmas: model SMPS10 as two regulators

Hi,

On Monday 01 July 2013 03:31 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 03:19:42PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> SMPS10 has two outputs OUT1 and OUT2 and have one input IN1.
>> SMPS10-OUT2 is connected to SMPS10-IN1 and can be configured either
>> in BOOST mode or BYPASS mode. regulator_enable of SMPS10-OUT2 configures
>> it in BOOST mode. For BYPASS mode regulator_allow_bypass() API can be
>> used. SMPS10-OUT1 is connected to SMPS10-OUT2 and can be enabled using
>> regulator_enable().
>
> This doesn't apply...

Ok. Which tree/branch should it be based on?. I created it on next-20130628
as base.

Thanks
Kishon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/