[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51D1AB6E.9030905@sr71.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 09:16:46 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To: Zheng Liu <gnehzuil.liu@...il.com>
CC: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mm: madvise: MADV_POPULATE for quick pre-faulting
On 06/28/2013 07:20 PM, Zheng Liu wrote:
>> > IOW, a process needing to do a bunch of MAP_POPULATEs isn't
>> > parallelizable, but one using this mechanism would be.
> I look at the code, and it seems that we will handle MAP_POPULATE flag
> after we release mmap_sem locking in vm_mmap_pgoff():
>
> down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> ret = do_mmap_pgoff(file, addr, len, prot, flag, pgoff,
> &populate);
> up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> if (populate)
> mm_populate(ret, populate);
>
> Am I missing something?
I went and did my same test using mmap(MAP_POPULATE)/munmap() pair
versus using MADV_POPULATE in 160 threads in parallel.
MADV_POPULATE was about 10x faster in the threaded configuration.
With MADV_POPULATE, the biggest cost is shipping the mmap_sem cacheline
around so that we can write the reader count update in to it. With
mmap(), there is a lot of _contention_ on that lock which is much, much
more expensive than simply bouncing a cacheline around.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists