[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51D1D043.5030509@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:53:55 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 12/15] perf tools: allow non-matching sample types
On 7/1/13 3:32 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Snip
>
>>
>> While this works for a combined S/W and tracepoint events session, I do not
>> like promoting sample types to the minimum compatible level for all events
>> in the session. perf needs to allow each event to have its own sample_type
>> and not force a minimal compatibility.
>
> Why? The impact is small. The kernel API is completely unchanged.
I'd like to see libperf become a stable, usable library - usable by more
than the perf binary and its builtin commands. I have already done this
once for a daemon, and it was a PITA to get the specific use functional
without memory leaks/growth in the libperf part.
With respect to this specific patch it means appropriate flexibility in
the data collected for events. ie., each event can have its own
sample_type. For example if the tracepoint already contains task
information TID is not needed - and IP may not be wanted either. The
code processing the samples should not require all events to have some
minimum data format - that just wastes buffer space.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists