[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1372705721.22688.13.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:08:41 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] tracing/kprobes: Turn trace_probe->files into
list_head
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 19:38 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> -static int
> -trace_probe_file_index(struct trace_probe *tp, struct ftrace_event_file *file)
> +static struct event_file_link *
> +find_event_file_link(struct trace_probe *tp, struct ftrace_event_file *file)
> {
> - struct ftrace_event_file **files;
> - int i;
> + struct event_file_link *link;
>
> - /*
> - * Since all tp->files updater is protected by probe_enable_lock,
> - * we don't need to lock an rcu_read_lock.
> - */
> - files = rcu_dereference_raw(tp->files);
> - if (files) {
> - for (i = 0; files[i]; i++)
> - if (files[i] == file)
> - return i;
> - }
> + list_for_each_entry(link, &tp->files, list)
> + if (link->file == file)
> + return link;
Shouldn't that be list_for_each_entry_rcu()?
-- Steve
>
> - return -1;
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists