[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130701200731.044116885@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 13:10:05 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: [ 10/26] s390/pci: Implement IRQ functions if !PCI
3.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
commit c46b54f7406780ec4cf9c9124d1cfb777674dc70 upstream.
All architectures must implement IRQ functions. Since various
dependencies on !S390 were removed, there are various drivers that can
be selected but will fail to link. Provide a dummy implementation of
these functions for the !PCI case.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
arch/s390/kernel/irq.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/s390/pci/pci.c | 33 -------------------------
2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
@@ -313,3 +313,67 @@ void measurement_alert_subclass_unregist
spin_unlock(&ma_subclass_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(measurement_alert_subclass_unregister);
+
+void synchronize_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+ /*
+ * Not needed, the handler is protected by a lock and IRQs that occur
+ * after the handler is deleted are just NOPs.
+ */
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_irq);
+
+#ifndef CONFIG_PCI
+
+/* Only PCI devices have dynamically-defined IRQ handlers */
+
+int request_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
+ unsigned long irqflags, const char *devname, void *dev_id)
+{
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_irq);
+
+void free_irq(unsigned int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+ WARN_ON(1);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(free_irq);
+
+void enable_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+ WARN_ON(1);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_irq);
+
+void disable_irq(unsigned int irq)
+{
+ WARN_ON(1);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disable_irq);
+
+#endif /* !CONFIG_PCI */
+
+void disable_irq_nosync(unsigned int irq)
+{
+ disable_irq(irq);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disable_irq_nosync);
+
+unsigned long probe_irq_on(void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(probe_irq_on);
+
+int probe_irq_off(unsigned long val)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(probe_irq_off);
+
+unsigned int probe_irq_mask(unsigned long val)
+{
+ return val;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(probe_irq_mask);
--- a/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
+++ b/arch/s390/pci/pci.c
@@ -306,15 +306,6 @@ static int zpci_cfg_store(struct zpci_de
return rc;
}
-void synchronize_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
- /*
- * Not needed, the handler is protected by a lock and IRQs that occur
- * after the handler is deleted are just NOPs.
- */
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_irq);
-
void enable_irq(unsigned int irq)
{
struct msi_desc *msi = irq_get_msi_desc(irq);
@@ -331,30 +322,6 @@ void disable_irq(unsigned int irq)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disable_irq);
-void disable_irq_nosync(unsigned int irq)
-{
- disable_irq(irq);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disable_irq_nosync);
-
-unsigned long probe_irq_on(void)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(probe_irq_on);
-
-int probe_irq_off(unsigned long val)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(probe_irq_off);
-
-unsigned int probe_irq_mask(unsigned long val)
-{
- return val;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(probe_irq_mask);
-
void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
{
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists