[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130701215932.GA12663@cynthia.pants.nu>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 14:59:32 -0700
From: Brad Boyer <flar@...thia.pants.nu>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k/mac: Allocate IOP message pool and queues
dynamically
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:46:48PM +1000, Finn Thain wrote:
>
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * Register the interrupt handler for the IOPs.
> > - * TODO: might be wrong for non-OSS machines. Anyone?
> > - */
> > -
> > -void __init iop_register_interrupts(void)
> > -{
> > - if (iop_ism_present) {
> > + /*
> > + * Register the interrupt handler for the IOPs.
> > + * TODO: might be wrong for non-OSS machines. Anyone?
>
> My testing with a non-OSS machine (Quadra 950) indicates that the TODO is
> obsolete. And the comment "register the interrupt handler for the IOPs" is
> a bit silly. It merely re-phrases the code. Otherwise, this patch looks
> good to me. Thanks.
The code was all originally written and tested only on the IIfx. That's
all JMT had, and at the time it was all I had as well. I have since
acquired a Quadra 950. Lots of these comments are just out of date. I
know it got tested on either a Quadra 900 or Quadra 950 after that
comment was put in the source.
Brad Boyer
flar@...andria.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists