| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 01:08:00 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tony.luck@...el.com, ananth@...ibm.com, masbock@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
lcm@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, ying.huang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mce, acpi/apei: Soft-offline a page on firmware
GHES notification
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:08:59PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> If the firmware indicates in GHES error data entry that the error threshold
> has exceeded for a corrected error event, then we try to soft-offline the
> page. This could be called in interrupt context, so we queue this up similar
> to how we handle memory failure scenarios.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 12 ++++++++++
> include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
> mm/memory-failure.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index fcd7d91..5a630ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -429,6 +429,18 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
> mem_err);
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE
> + if (sec_sev == GHES_SEV_CORRECTED &&
> + (gdata->flags & CPER_SEC_ERROR_THRESHOLD_EXCEEDED) &&
> + (mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)) {
> + unsigned long pfn;
> + pfn = mem_err->physical_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + if (pfn_valid(pfn))
> + soft_memory_failure_queue(pfn, 0, 0);
> + else
> + pr_warning(FW_WARN GHES_PFX
> + "Invalid address in generic error data: %#lx\n",
> + mem_err->physical_addr);
> + }
Yuck, this looks like BIOS code.
Can we carve out this into a function and do
void function(.. )
{
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE
<code at 1st indentation, much more readable>
#endif
}
so that we can nicely call it from ghes_do_proc()?
> if (sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
> sec_sev == GHES_SEV_RECOVERABLE &&
> mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index e0c8528..f9907d2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1787,6 +1787,7 @@ enum mf_flags {
> };
> extern int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int trapno, int flags);
> extern void memory_failure_queue(unsigned long pfn, int trapno, int flags);
> +extern void soft_memory_failure_queue(unsigned long pfn, int trapno, int flags);
> extern int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn);
> extern int sysctl_memory_failure_early_kill;
> extern int sysctl_memory_failure_recovery;
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index ceb0c7f..50caefd 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1222,6 +1222,7 @@ struct memory_failure_entry {
> unsigned long pfn;
> int trapno;
> int flags;
> + bool soft_offline;
Why a new bool? This flags int looks nice above. :)
> };
>
> struct memory_failure_cpu {
> @@ -1233,6 +1234,28 @@ struct memory_failure_cpu {
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct memory_failure_cpu, memory_failure_cpu);
>
> +void __memory_failure_queue(unsigned long pfn, int trapno, int flags, int soft_offline)
> +{
> + struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu;
> + unsigned long proc_flags;
> + struct memory_failure_entry entry = {
> + .pfn = pfn,
> + .trapno = trapno,
> + .flags = flags,
> + .soft_offline = soft_offline
> + };
> +
> + mf_cpu = &get_cpu_var(memory_failure_cpu);
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags);
> + if (kfifo_put(&mf_cpu->fifo, &entry))
> + schedule_work_on(smp_processor_id(), &mf_cpu->work);
> + else
> + pr_err("Memory failure: buffer overflow when queuing memory failure at 0x%#lx\n",
> + pfn);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags);
> + put_cpu_var(memory_failure_cpu);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * memory_failure_queue - Schedule handling memory failure of a page.
> * @pfn: Page Number of the corrupted page
> @@ -1250,28 +1273,19 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct memory_failure_cpu, memory_failure_cpu);
> *
> * Can run in IRQ context.
> */
> +
> void memory_failure_queue(unsigned long pfn, int trapno, int flags)
> {
> - struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu;
> - unsigned long proc_flags;
> - struct memory_failure_entry entry = {
> - .pfn = pfn,
> - .trapno = trapno,
> - .flags = flags,
> - };
> -
> - mf_cpu = &get_cpu_var(memory_failure_cpu);
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags);
> - if (kfifo_put(&mf_cpu->fifo, &entry))
> - schedule_work_on(smp_processor_id(), &mf_cpu->work);
> - else
> - pr_err("Memory failure: buffer overflow when queuing memory failure at 0x%#lx\n",
> - pfn);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags);
> - put_cpu_var(memory_failure_cpu);
> + __memory_failure_queue(pfn, trapno, flags, false);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(memory_failure_queue);
>
> +void soft_memory_failure_queue(unsigned long pfn, int trapno, int flags)
> +{
> + __memory_failure_queue(pfn, trapno, flags, true);
... which can save us this "true" thing there and maybe a bunch of code
churn around here too.
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(soft_memory_failure_queue);
> +
> static void memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu;
> @@ -1286,7 +1300,10 @@ static void memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags);
> if (!gotten)
> break;
> - memory_failure(entry.pfn, entry.trapno, entry.flags);
> + if (entry.soft_offline)
> + soft_offline_page(pfn_to_page(entry.pfn), entry.flags);
> + else
> + memory_failure(entry.pfn, entry.trapno, entry.flags);
> }
> }
>
>
>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists