[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1372662717.2974.23.camel@cr0>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:11:57 +0800
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch net-next 4/5] sunrpc: use generic union inet_addr
On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 16:36 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:43 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> [...]
> > -/**
> > - * rpc_cmp_addr - compare the address portion of two sockaddrs.
> > - * @sap1: first sockaddr
> > - * @sap2: second sockaddr
> > - *
> > - * Just compares the family and address portion. Ignores port, but
> > - * compares the scope if it's a link-local address.
>
> You're removing the scope comparison.
Actually I added the following code in patch 5/5:
+ if (!ipv6_addr_equal(&a->sin6.sin6_addr,
&b->sin6.sin6_addr))
+ return false;
+ else if
(__ipv6_addr_needs_scope_id(__ipv6_addr_type(&a->sin6.sin6_addr)))
+ return a->sin6.sin6_scope_id ==
b->sin6.sin6_scope_id;
but I should move it to this patch, otherwise it is hard for review.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists