[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1BAFE6F6C881BF42822005164F1491C33EC4E7AB@DBDE04.ent.ti.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 06:04:22 +0000
From: "Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.hebbar@...com>
To: "Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>
CC: "khilman@...aro.org" <khilman@...aro.org>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
"Bedia, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@...com>,
"Rajashekhara, Sudhakar" <sudhakar.raj@...com>,
"Grant Likely" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"Rob Landley" <rob@...dley.net>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] rtc: omap: add rtc wakeup support to alarm events
On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:32:34, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> On 6/28/2013 3:05 PM, Hebbar Gururaja wrote:
> > On some platforms (like AM33xx), a special register (RTC_IRQWAKEEN)
> > is available to enable Alarm Wakeup feature. This register needs to be
> > properly handled for the rtcwake to work properly.
> >
> > Platforms using such IP should set "ti,am3352-rtc" in rtc device dt
> > compatibility node.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@...com>
> > Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
> > Cc: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
> > Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
> > Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
> > Cc: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
> > Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
>
> [...]
>
> > -#define OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX 1
> > +#define OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX 1
> > +#define OMAP_RTC_DATA_AM335X_IDX 2
> >
> > static struct platform_device_id omap_rtc_devtype[] = {
> > {
> > @@ -309,6 +321,9 @@ static struct platform_device_id omap_rtc_devtype[] = {
> > }, {
> > .name = "da830-rtc",
> > .driver_data = OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER,
> > + }, {
> > + .name = "am335x-rtc",
>
> may be use am3352-rtc here just to keep the platform device name and of
> compatible in sync.
Correct. I will update the same in v2.
>
> > + .driver_data = OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER | OMAP_RTC_HAS_IRQWAKEEN,
> > },
> > {},
>
> It is better to use the index defined above in the static initialization
> so they remain in sync.
Sorry. I didn’t get this.
>
> ...
> [OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX] = {
> .name = "da830-rtc",
> .driver_data = OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER,
> },
> ...
>
> > };
> > @@ -318,6 +333,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id omap_rtc_of_match[] = {
> > { .compatible = "ti,da830-rtc",
> > .data = &omap_rtc_devtype[OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX],
> > },
> > + { .compatible = "ti,am3352-rtc",
> > + .data = &omap_rtc_devtype[OMAP_RTC_DATA_AM335X_IDX],
> > + },
> > {},
> > };
> > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, omap_rtc_of_match);
>
> Apart from these minor issues, the patch looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>
Regards,
Gururaja
Powered by blists - more mailing lists