[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51D27052.6080303@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:46:50 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: "Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.hebbar@...com>
CC: "khilman@...aro.org" <khilman@...aro.org>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
"Bedia, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@...com>,
"Rajashekhara, Sudhakar" <sudhakar.raj@...com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] rtc: omap: add rtc wakeup support to alarm events
On 7/2/2013 11:41 AM, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:39:28, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>> On 7/2/2013 11:34 AM, Hebbar, Gururaja wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 11:32:34, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>>>> On 6/28/2013 3:05 PM, Hebbar Gururaja wrote:
>>>>> On some platforms (like AM33xx), a special register (RTC_IRQWAKEEN)
>>>>> is available to enable Alarm Wakeup feature. This register needs to be
>>>>> properly handled for the rtcwake to work properly.
>>>>>
>>>>> Platforms using such IP should set "ti,am3352-rtc" in rtc device dt
>>>>> compatibility node.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@...com>
>>>>> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
>>>>> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
>>>>> Cc: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
>>>>> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
>>>>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
>>>>> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
>>>>> Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
>>>>> Cc: devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
>>>>> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>>
>>>>> -#define OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX 1
>>>>> +#define OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX 1
>>>>> +#define OMAP_RTC_DATA_AM335X_IDX 2
>>>>>
>>>>> static struct platform_device_id omap_rtc_devtype[] = {
>>>>> {
>>>>> @@ -309,6 +321,9 @@ static struct platform_device_id omap_rtc_devtype[] = {
>>>>> }, {
>>>>> .name = "da830-rtc",
>>>>> .driver_data = OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER,
>>>>> + }, {
>>>>> + .name = "am335x-rtc",
>>>>
>>>> may be use am3352-rtc here just to keep the platform device name and of
>>>> compatible in sync.
>>>
>>> Correct. I will update the same in v2.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> + .driver_data = OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER | OMAP_RTC_HAS_IRQWAKEEN,
>>>>> },
>>>>> {},
>>>>
>>>> It is better to use the index defined above in the static initialization
>>>> so they remain in sync.
>>>
>>> Sorry. I didn’t get this.
>>>
>>
>> See example below I provided. If its still not clear, let me know what
>> is not clear.
>>
>>>> ...
>>>> [OMAP_RTC_DATA_DA830_IDX] = {
>>>> .name = "da830-rtc",
>>>> .driver_data = OMAP_RTC_HAS_KICKER,
>>>> },
>
> Thanks for the clarification. In this case will it ok if I update the previous
> member also.
You dont really reference [0] in omap_rtc_of_match[] so even if you
leave it as-is, that's fine with me. I am mostly concerned with the
index definitions and initialization order being out of sync and that's
really not an issue with [0].
Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists