linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3 06/15] perf tools: fix parse_events_terms() freeing local variable on error path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51D27280.30007@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 02 Jul 2013 09:26:08 +0300
From:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
CC:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 06/15] perf tools: fix parse_events_terms() freeing
 local variable on error path

On 01/07/13 21:46, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/1/13 2:01 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 28/06/13 20:19, David Ahern wrote:
>>> On 6/28/13 2:43 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>>> The list_head is on the stack, so just free the rest of the list.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 7 ++++++-
>>>>    tools/perf/util/parse-events.h | 1 +
>>>>    tools/perf/util/pmu.c          | 2 +-
>>>>    3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
>>>> b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
>>>> index 995fc25..d9cb055 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
>>>> @@ -1231,12 +1231,17 @@ int parse_events_term__clone(struct
>>>> parse_events_term **new,
>>>>                term->val.str, term->val.num);
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> -void parse_events__free_terms(struct list_head *terms)
>>>> +void parse_events__free_terms_only(struct list_head *terms)
>>>>    {
>>>>        struct parse_events_term *term, *h;
>>>>
>>>>        list_for_each_entry_safe(term, h, terms, list)
>>>>            free(term);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +void parse_events__free_terms(struct list_head *terms)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    parse_events__free_terms_only(terms);
>>>>
>>>>        free(terms);
>>>>    }
>>>
>>> I still don't understand the reasoning for an _only function. There is only
>>> 1 place that mallocs the list_head and that 1 user should free its own
>>> memory. All of the other users pass a stack variable.
>>
>> No.  See parse-events.y
> 
> Fine. Fix both then. My point is that parse-events.c code should not be
> freeing memory it does not allocate.

No.  Read the code.  The 'head' member is shared with other lists.  It does
not make sense to turn a tiny bug-fix into such a lot of re-work.

>>
>> The list head is defined as a pointer in the YYTYPE stack element:
>>
>> %union
>> {
>>     char *str;
>>     u64 num;
>>     struct list_head *head;
>>     struct parse_events_term *term;
>> }
>>
>> It is malloc'ed when terms are created:
>>
>> event_term
>> {
>>     struct list_head *head = malloc(sizeof(*head));
>>     struct parse_events_term *term = $1;
>>
>>     ABORT_ON(!head);
>>     INIT_LIST_HEAD(head);
>>     list_add_tail(&term->list, head);
>>     $$ = head;
>> }
>>
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/