linux-kernel - Re: Multiple DA9055 chips

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130702093130.GX27646@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 2 Jul 2013 10:31:30 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Ashish Chavan <ashish.chavan@...tcummins.com>
Cc:	David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
	Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@...tcummins.com>,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: Multiple DA9055 chips

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 03:01:53PM +0530, Ashish Chavan wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 17:48 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It seems we have two drivers in mainline for da9055 on I2C.  We've got
> > one in sound/soc/codecs/da9055.c and one in drivers/mfd/da9055-i2c.c,
> > both registering themselves identically.  What's going on here?  Is this
> > a combined CODEC and PMIC, has someone decided to release two chips with
> > the same name or is one of the drivers misnamed?

> Yes, this is a combined CODEC and PMIC.

OK, in that case the CODEC driver is just plain broken then.  Did anyone
actually test this stuff?  Please fix.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)